Sunday, June 21, 2009

Rafsanjani Seeking to End Role of “Supreme Leader”?

AP:

TEHRAN, Iran – A backstage struggle among Iran's ruling clerics burst into the open Sunday when the government said it had arrested the daughter and other relatives of an ayatollah who is one of the country's most powerful men.


Threats Watch:
Folks, this is huge. Huge. A report from Saudi Arabia's al-Arabiya, Iranian clerics seek supreme leader alternative, indicates that Rafsanjani is seeking to eliminate the Supreme Leader. Not just the man, but the position and role presiding over Iranian politics and the Iranian society.
Religious leaders are considering an alternative to the supreme leader structure after at least 13 people were killed in the latest unrest to shake Tehran and family members of Ayatollah Rafsanjani were arrested amid calls by former President Mohammad Khatami for the release of all protesters. Iran's religious clerks in Qom and members of the Assembly of Experts, headed by former President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, are mulling the formation of an alternative collective leadership to replace that of the supreme leader, sources in Qom told Al Arabiya on condition of anonymity.
Skipping down a bit, here's what they seem to have in mind, obviously a bit sketchy at this point.
Members of the assembly are reportedly considering forming a collective ruling body and scrapping the model of Ayatollah Khomeini as a way out of the civil crisis that has engulfed Tehran in a series of protests, The discussions have taken place in a series of secret meetings convened in the holy city of Qom and included Jawad al-Shahristani, the supreme representative of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who is the foremost Shiite leader in Iraq. An option being considered is the resignation of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as Iran's president following condemnation by the United States and other European nations for violence and human rights violations against unarmed protestors.
This is a huge development. One of the biggest questions I and others have had since the Iranian protests/revolt/revolution began was whether Mousavi would be any different in tangible effect (Hizballah & Hamas support, etc.) than Ahmadinejad and whether Rafsanjani was seeking to sack 'Supreme' Leader Khamenei simply to acquire the powerful position for himself. That question perhaps may have been answered today. My ears first perked up when word made it through the grapevines over the weekend that Rafsanjani had been meeting with other Ayatollahs and clerics in Qom, and had among them a representative of Iraq's Ayatollah Ali Sistani. Why? Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in 2007 made two very critical statements: that "I am a servant of all Iraqis, there is no difference between a Sunni, a Shiite or a Kurd or a Christian," and that Islam can exist within a democracy without theological conflict. You will never hear such words slip past the lips of Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei. Ever. Sistani's presence at the Rafsanjani talks in Qom, Iran, through a representative brings therefore added significance. And the al-Arabiya report above seems to suggest that Rafsanjani is not seeking Sistani's support for superficial reasons.
Read the rest.

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

Blogger Bloviating Zeppelin said...

Is this hot air and conjecture? Is this "spin" placed into the Iranian ozone because now the entire world is watching Teheran and the Iranians want to finish their nuclear projects in relative silence?

Yes, amazing at this point. I'll believe those things when I actually see those things. At this point I'm thinking: smokescreen.

BZ

Monday, June 22, 2009 11:44:00 AM  
Blogger Z said...

BOY, I sure hope this is all true......HUGE isn't the word.
Of course, BZ makes an excellent point about the nukes; we've about done everything we possibly can to ensure their completion and the completion of ways to get them...here. Or to israel.
fingers crossed..purple inked fingers, too.

Monday, June 22, 2009 1:59:00 PM  
Blogger Chuck said...

This is all interesting but I think a wait and see approach is the best course. I do believe though that Iran has already undergone change, no matter what comes of this.

Monday, June 22, 2009 5:41:00 PM  
Blogger christian soldier said...

I stand with any who fight for freedom...the youth there have a spirit that brings to mind the words:
Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death...
C-CS

Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:25:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Day By Day© by Chris Muir.

© Copyright, Sparks from the Anvil, All Rights Reserved