Monday, October 13, 2008

Obamanomics 95

Obama is now on the campaign trail rolling out a new set of economic proposals, late in the game.

Meanwhile in the Wall Street Journal:
One of Barack Obama's most potent campaign claims is that he'll cut taxes for no less than 95% of "working families." He's even promising to cut taxes enough that the government's tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% -- which is lower than it is today.

It's a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he's also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."


There's no reason why John McCain should lose on the economic issue. Not only is Obamanomics wrong for the American economy, but the Obamessiah should be hammered on his associations to those directly responsible for the current economic crisis:

Franklin Raines, the immediate past CEO of Fannie Mae – who has collected a $90 million golden parachute while driving Fannie into the ground – has advised Obama on housing issues.

Jim Johnson, yet another former Fannie Mae CEO, resigned from Obama’s vice presidential search team when it was revealed he had received a sweetheart home mortgage deal.

Despite serving in the Senate for only four years, Obama himself has been the second-largest recipient of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac largesse in the entire Congress, ahead even of former presidential candidate John Kerry, who’s spent two decades in the Senate?

Obama’s long-time political ally, radical group ACORN, played a key role in pressuring banks to offer loans to those who were unlikely to be able to pay them back. ACORN has taken credit for pressuring banks to accept undocumented income as a basis for offering loans, for offering loans without using credit scores, and for making 100% financed loans available to low-income people.

Labels: , ,


Blogger Chuck said...

To me this chart shows tax increases at $100,000, wonder why he's not being called on this?

Monday, October 13, 2008 3:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All but the clean car credit would be "refundable," which is [Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer -- a federal check -- from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this "welfare," or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a "Demogrant." Mr. Obama's genius is to call it a tax cut.]

So basically if I am reading this right, Obama is rewarding people for being low income. As you make more you get taxed more. Yeah, that's just brilliant. It's an initiative to be lazy and get a low paying job. The worst part is that people are buying into this and are excited about his "tax cut."

Monday, October 13, 2008 5:21:00 PM  
Blogger Gayle said...

Obama attempts - like all liberals - to take away the incentive of Americans to excel. Well, that's not a huge surprise, is it?

McCain says he will kick Obama's butt in the debate. I surely do hope so. He has a plan too and we'll find out about it tomorrow night.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:51:00 AM  
Blogger The Liberal Lie The Conservative Truth said...

This guy makes Pinnochio look like the master of truth telling.

Did you catch him on Sunday actually admitting his socialism or as he put it ,"spreading the wealth," on Sunday. I posted a video showing him talking to a self employed plumber about how he was going to tax this guys hard earned income!

What a jack ass!

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:57:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Day By Day© by Chris Muir.

© Copyright, Sparks from the Anvil, All Rights Reserved