Thursday, March 13, 2008

How is it that this idiot has his own news program?


Blogger Marie's Two Cents said...

What a Lunatic.

I remember back when I was still living in California Keith Olberman was a Sports Caster on some off beat channel.

Maybe he should have just stuck to sports because he sucks doing anything else.

Hell he even sucked doing sports!

Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:13:00 PM  
Blogger Bloviating Zeppelin said...

These two phrases came to mind on the issue:

1. Ferraro was stating the obvious.
2. Legally, these are termed "facts in evidence."


Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:39:00 PM  
Blogger J_G said...

Geraldine Ferraro's words echo loudly among the blue collar whites in Pennsylvania. I'll be surprised if Barack Hussein Obama gets more than 30 percent in Pennsylvania. I have a couple of more days to change my registration but I think I'll just let my colleagues at work take care of their own candidates and their party. Most feel the work environment has suffered greatly from Affirmative action and quotas and now most of them will go to the polls to show their extreme displeasure. Most of my colleagues are chomping at the bit to go vote for Clinton even though they can't stand her. It's more to show the exact same feelings that Ferraro has expressed.

Imagine this; a two term State Senator and two year US Senator from Indiana name Barney Hubert O'Donnell, he is very liberal, his ideals border on Soviet style socialism and is white. Does anyone beleive Barney Hubert O'Donnell would still be in the race for President today or even have been a serious contender from the very beginning? If you say yes you are just kidding yourself and you know it or just to don't want to admit it.

Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:14:00 PM  
Blogger SkyePuppy said...

Ugh! I couldn't even watch the whole thing. Who is that guy? I never watch MSNBC, and now I have even more incentive to avoid the channel like the plague.

Friday, March 14, 2008 10:45:00 AM  
Blogger The Griper said...


1. Ferraro was stating the obvious.
2. Legally, these are termed "facts in evidence."

3. it isn't politically correct speech and this takes precedence over 1 and 2 in the liberal handbook

Friday, March 14, 2008 5:49:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Day By Day© by Chris Muir.

© Copyright, Sparks from the Anvil, All Rights Reserved